Oncology produces more knowledge than at any moment in history — and delivers it unevenly. The trial that could change a patient's course recruits three states away. The biomarker that would redirect therapy hides in an unread PDF. The evidence engine of modern medicine still runs on a fraction of the patients it serves. We call this what it is: the enrollment paradox — infinite information, scarce access.
Prediction alone will not fix it. The next era of clinical AI belongs to world models — systems that don't merely classify what a tumor is, but represent the state of a patient and simulate what happens next. Digital twins that rehearse a therapy before a body must. Dynamic knowledge graphs that update the moment evidence changes. Neurosymbolic architectures that reason over guidelines and show their work — because in medicine, an answer without provenance is not an answer.
"A consented, foundational model of oncology — where every patient contributes to the intelligence of the system, and the system returns the favor."
That is what this lab builds. Not demos — infrastructure: multi-agent hubs that match patients to trials in real time, surveillance frameworks that keep clinical AI honest, and architectures designed to scale from Philadelphia to Bogotá. Cancer care is a systems problem. The system is learnable.